Skip to main content

This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1407

reference
102-tree-1
name
1407
tree-preservation-order

undefined

102-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.000554 50.859848)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.000469 50.859839,-1.000473 50.859856,-1.000485 50.859871,-1.000503 50.859883,-1.000527 50.859891,-1.000553 50.859894,-1.000579 50.859891,-1.000603 50.859884,-1.000622 50.859872,-1.000635 50.859857,-1.000639 50.859841,-1.000636 50.859824,-1.000624 50.859809,-1.000605 50.859797,-1.000582 50.859789,-1.000555 50.859786,-1.000529 50.859788,-1.000505 50.859796,-1.000486 50.859808,-1.000473 50.859823,-1.000469 50.859839)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL