Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1299

reference
103-tree-1
name
1299
tree-preservation-order

undefined

103-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.003172 50.860186)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.003115 50.860180,-1.003118 50.860191,-1.003125 50.860201,-1.003138 50.860209,-1.003154 50.860214,-1.003171 50.860216,-1.003189 50.860215,-1.003205 50.860210,-1.003217 50.860202,-1.003226 50.860192,-1.003229 50.860181,-1.003226 50.860170,-1.003218 50.860159,-1.003206 50.860151,-1.003190 50.860146,-1.003173 50.860144,-1.003155 50.860146,-1.003139 50.860151,-1.003126 50.860159,-1.003118 50.860169,-1.003115 50.860180)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL