Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1216

reference
108-tree-1
name
1216
tree-preservation-order

undefined

108-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.012732 50.865471)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.012647 50.865462,-1.012651 50.865478,-1.012663 50.865494,-1.012681 50.865506,-1.012705 50.865513,-1.012731 50.865516,-1.012757 50.865514,-1.012781 50.865506,-1.012800 50.865495,-1.012813 50.865480,-1.012817 50.865463,-1.012814 50.865446,-1.012802 50.865431,-1.012783 50.865419,-1.012760 50.865411,-1.012733 50.865408,-1.012707 50.865411,-1.012683 50.865418,-1.012664 50.865430,-1.012651 50.865445,-1.012647 50.865462)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL