Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

2023

reference
11-tree-1
name
2023
tree-preservation-order

undefined

11-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-0.983088 50.785456)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-0.983031 50.785450,-0.983034 50.785461,-0.983042 50.785471,-0.983054 50.785479,-0.983070 50.785484,-0.983087 50.785486,-0.983105 50.785485,-0.983121 50.785480,-0.983133 50.785472,-0.983142 50.785462,-0.983145 50.785451,-0.983142 50.785440,-0.983134 50.785429,-0.983122 50.785421,-0.983106 50.785416,-0.983089 50.785414,-0.983071 50.785416,-0.983055 50.785421,-0.983042 50.785429,-0.983034 50.785439,-0.983031 50.785450)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL