Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1440

reference
119-tree-1
name
1440
tree-preservation-order

undefined

119-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.030488 50.866534)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.030445 50.866529,-1.030447 50.866537,-1.030453 50.866545,-1.030462 50.866551,-1.030474 50.866555,-1.030487 50.866556,-1.030500 50.866555,-1.030512 50.866551,-1.030522 50.866545,-1.030528 50.866538,-1.030530 50.866530,-1.030528 50.866521,-1.030522 50.866514,-1.030513 50.866508,-1.030501 50.866504,-1.030488 50.866502,-1.030463 50.866507,-1.030453 50.866513,-1.030447 50.866521,-1.030445 50.866529)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL