Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1440

reference
121-tree-1
name
1440
tree-preservation-order

undefined

121-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.030134 50.866608)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.030063 50.866600,-1.030066 50.866614,-1.030076 50.866627,-1.030091 50.866637,-1.030111 50.866644,-1.030133 50.866646,-1.030155 50.866644,-1.030175 50.866638,-1.030191 50.866628,-1.030201 50.866616,-1.030205 50.866602,-1.030202 50.866588,-1.030192 50.866575,-1.030176 50.866565,-1.030157 50.866558,-1.030135 50.866556,-1.030113 50.866558,-1.030093 50.866564,-1.030077 50.866574,-1.030066 50.866587,-1.030063 50.866600)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL