Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1182

reference
127-tree-1
name
1182
tree-preservation-order

undefined

127-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.030014 50.866917)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.029929 50.866908,-1.029933 50.866925,-1.029945 50.866940,-1.029963 50.866952,-1.029987 50.866960,-1.030013 50.866962,-1.030040 50.866960,-1.030064 50.866953,-1.030083 50.866941,-1.030095 50.866926,-1.030100 50.866909,-1.030096 50.866893,-1.030084 50.866877,-1.030065 50.866865,-1.030042 50.866857,-1.030015 50.866855,-1.029989 50.866857,-1.029965 50.866864,-1.029946 50.866876,-1.029934 50.866891,-1.029929 50.866908)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL