Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1381

reference
132-tree-1
name
1381
tree-preservation-order

undefined

132-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.032518 50.865247)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.032390 50.865234,-1.032396 50.865259,-1.032414 50.865281,-1.032442 50.865299,-1.032477 50.865311,-1.032516 50.865316,-1.032556 50.865312,-1.032592 50.865301,-1.032621 50.865283,-1.032639 50.865261,-1.032646 50.865236,-1.032640 50.865211,-1.032623 50.865188,-1.032595 50.865170,-1.032559 50.865158,-1.032520 50.865154,-1.032480 50.865157,-1.032444 50.865169,-1.032416 50.865186,-1.032397 50.865209,-1.032390 50.865234)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL