Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1381

reference
137-tree-1
name
1381
tree-preservation-order

undefined

137-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.032109 50.865210)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.032024 50.865201,-1.032027 50.865218,-1.032039 50.865233,-1.032058 50.865245,-1.032081 50.865253,-1.032108 50.865255,-1.032134 50.865253,-1.032158 50.865246,-1.032177 50.865234,-1.032190 50.865219,-1.032194 50.865202,-1.032190 50.865186,-1.032178 50.865170,-1.032160 50.865158,-1.032136 50.865150,-1.032110 50.865148,-1.032084 50.865150,-1.032060 50.865157,-1.032040 50.865169,-1.032028 50.865184,-1.032024 50.865201)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL