Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0496

reference
140-tree-1
name
0496
tree-preservation-order

undefined

140-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.003772 50.853032)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.003729 50.853027,-1.003731 50.853036,-1.003737 50.853043,-1.003746 50.853049,-1.003758 50.853053,-1.003771 50.853055,-1.003796 50.853050,-1.003806 50.853044,-1.003812 50.853036,-1.003814 50.853028,-1.003813 50.853020,-1.003807 50.853012,-1.003797 50.853006,-1.003786 50.853002,-1.003772 50.853001,-1.003759 50.853002,-1.003747 50.853006,-1.003738 50.853011,-1.003732 50.853019,-1.003729 50.853027)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL