Skip to main content

This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0496

reference
141-tree-1
name
0496
tree-preservation-order

undefined

141-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.003892 50.853037)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.003863 50.853034,-1.003865 50.853040,-1.003869 50.853045,-1.003875 50.853049,-1.003891 50.853052,-1.003900 50.853052,-1.003915 50.853045,-1.003919 50.853040,-1.003920 50.853035,-1.003919 50.853029,-1.003915 50.853024,-1.003901 50.853017,-1.003892 50.853016,-1.003883 50.853017,-1.003875 50.853020,-1.003869 50.853024,-1.003863 50.853034)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL