Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0496

reference
151-tree-1
name
0496
tree-preservation-order

undefined

151-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.004820 50.852572)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.004735 50.852563,-1.004739 50.852579,-1.004751 50.852595,-1.004769 50.852607,-1.004793 50.852615,-1.004819 50.852617,-1.004845 50.852615,-1.004869 50.852608,-1.004888 50.852596,-1.004901 50.852581,-1.004905 50.852564,-1.004902 50.852548,-1.004890 50.852532,-1.004871 50.852520,-1.004848 50.852512,-1.004821 50.852510,-1.004795 50.852512,-1.004771 50.852519,-1.004752 50.852531,-1.004740 50.852546,-1.004735 50.852563)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL