Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1182

reference
205-tree-1
name
1182
tree-preservation-order

undefined

205-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.028783 50.867162)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.028726 50.867156,-1.028729 50.867167,-1.028736 50.867177,-1.028749 50.867185,-1.028765 50.867190,-1.028782 50.867192,-1.028800 50.867191,-1.028816 50.867186,-1.028828 50.867178,-1.028837 50.867168,-1.028840 50.867157,-1.028837 50.867146,-1.028829 50.867136,-1.028817 50.867128,-1.028801 50.867122,-1.028784 50.867120,-1.028766 50.867122,-1.028750 50.867127,-1.028737 50.867135,-1.028729 50.867145,-1.028726 50.867156)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL