Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1604

reference
214-tree-1
name
1604
tree-preservation-order

undefined

214-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.040037 50.898927)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.039852 50.898907,-1.039861 50.898943,-1.039886 50.898976,-1.039926 50.899002,-1.039978 50.899019,-1.040035 50.899025,-1.040092 50.899020,-1.040144 50.899004,-1.040185 50.898979,-1.040212 50.898946,-1.040222 50.898910,-1.040214 50.898874,-1.040188 50.898841,-1.040148 50.898815,-1.040096 50.898798,-1.040039 50.898792,-1.039982 50.898797,-1.039930 50.898813,-1.039889 50.898839,-1.039862 50.898871,-1.039852 50.898907)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL