Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1589

reference
218-tree-1
name
1589
tree-preservation-order

undefined

218-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.040682 50.898085)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.040611 50.898077,-1.040614 50.898091,-1.040624 50.898104,-1.040639 50.898114,-1.040659 50.898120,-1.040681 50.898123,-1.040703 50.898121,-1.040723 50.898114,-1.040739 50.898104,-1.040749 50.898092,-1.040753 50.898078,-1.040750 50.898064,-1.040740 50.898052,-1.040725 50.898042,-1.040705 50.898035,-1.040683 50.898033,-1.040661 50.898035,-1.040641 50.898041,-1.040625 50.898051,-1.040615 50.898063,-1.040611 50.898077)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL