Skip to main content

This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1588

reference
277-tree-1
name
1588
tree-preservation-order

undefined

277-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.040449 50.897868)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.040406 50.897864,-1.040408 50.897872,-1.040414 50.897879,-1.040423 50.897886,-1.040448 50.897891,-1.040462 50.897890,-1.040474 50.897886,-1.040483 50.897880,-1.040489 50.897873,-1.040492 50.897864,-1.040490 50.897856,-1.040484 50.897848,-1.040474 50.897842,-1.040463 50.897838,-1.040449 50.897837,-1.040436 50.897838,-1.040424 50.897842,-1.040415 50.897848,-1.040409 50.897855,-1.040406 50.897864)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL