Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1182

reference
280-tree-1
name
1182
tree-preservation-order

undefined

280-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.028796 50.866536)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.028754 50.866531,-1.028756 50.866539,-1.028762 50.866547,-1.028771 50.866553,-1.028783 50.866557,-1.028796 50.866558,-1.028809 50.866557,-1.028821 50.866554,-1.028831 50.866548,-1.028837 50.866540,-1.028839 50.866532,-1.028837 50.866523,-1.028831 50.866516,-1.028822 50.866510,-1.028810 50.866506,-1.028797 50.866505,-1.028784 50.866506,-1.028772 50.866509,-1.028762 50.866515,-1.028756 50.866523,-1.028754 50.866531)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL