Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1588

reference
284-tree-1
name
1588
tree-preservation-order

undefined

284-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.040417 50.897912)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.040374 50.897908,-1.040376 50.897916,-1.040382 50.897924,-1.040391 50.897930,-1.040403 50.897934,-1.040416 50.897935,-1.040429 50.897934,-1.040441 50.897930,-1.040451 50.897924,-1.040457 50.897917,-1.040459 50.897908,-1.040457 50.897900,-1.040452 50.897893,-1.040442 50.897887,-1.040430 50.897883,-1.040417 50.897881,-1.040404 50.897882,-1.040392 50.897886,-1.040383 50.897892,-1.040376 50.897899,-1.040374 50.897908)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL