Skip to main content

This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1588

reference
285-tree-1
name
1588
tree-preservation-order

undefined

285-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.040460 50.897803)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.040418 50.897798,-1.040419 50.897806,-1.040425 50.897814,-1.040435 50.897820,-1.040446 50.897824,-1.040460 50.897825,-1.040473 50.897824,-1.040485 50.897820,-1.040494 50.897814,-1.040501 50.897807,-1.040503 50.897799,-1.040501 50.897790,-1.040495 50.897783,-1.040486 50.897777,-1.040474 50.897773,-1.040461 50.897771,-1.040436 50.897776,-1.040426 50.897782,-1.040420 50.897790,-1.040418 50.897798)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL