Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1588

reference
296-tree-1
name
1588
tree-preservation-order

undefined

296-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.040967 50.897747)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.040896 50.897740,-1.040899 50.897754,-1.040909 50.897766,-1.040924 50.897776,-1.040944 50.897783,-1.040966 50.897785,-1.040988 50.897783,-1.041008 50.897777,-1.041024 50.897767,-1.041034 50.897755,-1.041038 50.897741,-1.041035 50.897727,-1.041025 50.897715,-1.041009 50.897704,-1.040990 50.897698,-1.040968 50.897695,-1.040946 50.897698,-1.040926 50.897704,-1.040910 50.897714,-1.040900 50.897726,-1.040896 50.897740)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL