Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0955

reference
306-tree-1
name
0955
tree-preservation-order

undefined

306-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.018973 50.866612)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.018917 50.866606,-1.018919 50.866617,-1.018927 50.866627,-1.018939 50.866636,-1.018955 50.866641,-1.018973 50.866643,-1.018990 50.866641,-1.019006 50.866636,-1.019019 50.866628,-1.019027 50.866618,-1.019030 50.866607,-1.019028 50.866596,-1.019020 50.866586,-1.019007 50.866578,-1.018992 50.866573,-1.018974 50.866571,-1.018957 50.866572,-1.018941 50.866577,-1.018928 50.866585,-1.018920 50.866595,-1.018917 50.866606)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL