Skip to main content

This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1357

reference
307-tree-1
name
1357
tree-preservation-order

undefined

307-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.026752 50.893681)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.026709 50.893677,-1.026711 50.893685,-1.026717 50.893692,-1.026726 50.893698,-1.026738 50.893702,-1.026751 50.893704,-1.026765 50.893703,-1.026777 50.893699,-1.026786 50.893693,-1.026792 50.893686,-1.026795 50.893677,-1.026793 50.893669,-1.026787 50.893661,-1.026778 50.893655,-1.026766 50.893651,-1.026753 50.893650,-1.026739 50.893651,-1.026727 50.893655,-1.026718 50.893661,-1.026712 50.893668,-1.026709 50.893677)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL