Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1357

reference
309-tree-1
name
1357
tree-preservation-order

undefined

309-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.026474 50.893458)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.026417 50.893452,-1.026419 50.893464,-1.026427 50.893474,-1.026440 50.893482,-1.026455 50.893487,-1.026473 50.893489,-1.026491 50.893487,-1.026507 50.893482,-1.026519 50.893474,-1.026528 50.893464,-1.026531 50.893453,-1.026528 50.893442,-1.026520 50.893432,-1.026508 50.893424,-1.026492 50.893419,-1.026474 50.893417,-1.026457 50.893419,-1.026441 50.893423,-1.026428 50.893431,-1.026420 50.893441,-1.026417 50.893452)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL