Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1814

reference
314-tree-1
name
1814
tree-preservation-order

undefined

314-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.006062 50.855352)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.006006 50.855346,-1.006008 50.855357,-1.006016 50.855367,-1.006028 50.855375,-1.006044 50.855380,-1.006062 50.855382,-1.006079 50.855380,-1.006095 50.855375,-1.006108 50.855368,-1.006116 50.855358,-1.006119 50.855347,-1.006117 50.855335,-1.006109 50.855325,-1.006096 50.855317,-1.006081 50.855312,-1.006063 50.855310,-1.006046 50.855312,-1.006030 50.855317,-1.006017 50.855325,-1.006009 50.855335,-1.006006 50.855346)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL