Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1182

reference
317-tree-1
name
1182
tree-preservation-order

undefined

317-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.029059 50.866327)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.029003 50.866321,-1.029005 50.866332,-1.029013 50.866342,-1.029025 50.866350,-1.029041 50.866356,-1.029059 50.866357,-1.029076 50.866356,-1.029092 50.866351,-1.029105 50.866343,-1.029113 50.866333,-1.029116 50.866322,-1.029114 50.866311,-1.029106 50.866301,-1.029094 50.866293,-1.029078 50.866287,-1.029060 50.866285,-1.029043 50.866287,-1.029027 50.866292,-1.029014 50.866300,-1.029006 50.866310,-1.029003 50.866321)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL