Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1953

reference
32-tree-1
name
1953
tree-preservation-order

undefined

32-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.015788 50.900806)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.015731 50.900800,-1.015734 50.900811,-1.015742 50.900821,-1.015754 50.900829,-1.015770 50.900834,-1.015787 50.900836,-1.015805 50.900834,-1.015821 50.900829,-1.015834 50.900822,-1.015842 50.900812,-1.015845 50.900801,-1.015842 50.900789,-1.015834 50.900779,-1.015822 50.900771,-1.015806 50.900766,-1.015789 50.900764,-1.015771 50.900766,-1.015755 50.900771,-1.015742 50.900779,-1.015734 50.900789,-1.015731 50.900800)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL