Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0955

reference
324-tree-1
name
0955
tree-preservation-order

undefined

324-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.018477 50.866528)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.018434 50.866523,-1.018436 50.866531,-1.018442 50.866539,-1.018452 50.866545,-1.018463 50.866549,-1.018476 50.866550,-1.018490 50.866549,-1.018502 50.866545,-1.018511 50.866540,-1.018517 50.866532,-1.018520 50.866524,-1.018518 50.866515,-1.018512 50.866508,-1.018503 50.866502,-1.018491 50.866498,-1.018478 50.866496,-1.018452 50.866501,-1.018443 50.866507,-1.018437 50.866515,-1.018434 50.866523)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL