Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1182

reference
328-tree-1
name
1182
tree-preservation-order

undefined

328-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.028634 50.866303)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.028606 50.866300,-1.028607 50.866306,-1.028611 50.866311,-1.028617 50.866315,-1.028634 50.866318,-1.028643 50.866318,-1.028651 50.866315,-1.028657 50.866311,-1.028663 50.866301,-1.028658 50.866290,-1.028643 50.866283,-1.028635 50.866282,-1.028626 50.866283,-1.028618 50.866286,-1.028607 50.866295,-1.028606 50.866300)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL