Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0955

reference
330-tree-1
name
0955
tree-preservation-order

undefined

330-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.017175 50.866925)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.017147 50.866922,-1.017148 50.866927,-1.017152 50.866932,-1.017166 50.866939,-1.017175 50.866940,-1.017192 50.866937,-1.017198 50.866933,-1.017202 50.866928,-1.017204 50.866922,-1.017203 50.866917,-1.017199 50.866912,-1.017193 50.866908,-1.017185 50.866905,-1.017176 50.866904,-1.017159 50.866907,-1.017153 50.866911,-1.017149 50.866916,-1.017147 50.866922)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL