Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1582

reference
340-tree-1
name
1582
tree-preservation-order

undefined

340-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.044972 50.894217)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.044887 50.894208,-1.044891 50.894225,-1.044903 50.894240,-1.044921 50.894252,-1.044945 50.894260,-1.044971 50.894263,-1.044998 50.894260,-1.045022 50.894253,-1.045041 50.894241,-1.045053 50.894226,-1.045058 50.894209,-1.045054 50.894193,-1.045042 50.894177,-1.045023 50.894165,-1.045000 50.894158,-1.044973 50.894155,-1.044947 50.894157,-1.044923 50.894165,-1.044904 50.894176,-1.044892 50.894191,-1.044887 50.894208)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL