Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1578

reference
344-tree-1
name
1578
tree-preservation-order

undefined

344-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.045288 50.894007)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.045189 50.893997,-1.045193 50.894016,-1.045207 50.894034,-1.045229 50.894048,-1.045256 50.894057,-1.045287 50.894061,-1.045318 50.894058,-1.045346 50.894049,-1.045368 50.894035,-1.045382 50.894018,-1.045388 50.893998,-1.045383 50.893979,-1.045369 50.893961,-1.045348 50.893947,-1.045320 50.893938,-1.045289 50.893935,-1.045259 50.893937,-1.045231 50.893946,-1.045208 50.893960,-1.045194 50.893977,-1.045189 50.893997)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL