Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1578

reference
347-tree-1
name
1578
tree-preservation-order

undefined

347-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.045460 50.893900)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.045361 50.893890,-1.045365 50.893909,-1.045379 50.893927,-1.045401 50.893941,-1.045428 50.893950,-1.045459 50.893954,-1.045490 50.893951,-1.045518 50.893942,-1.045540 50.893928,-1.045554 50.893911,-1.045560 50.893891,-1.045555 50.893872,-1.045541 50.893854,-1.045520 50.893840,-1.045492 50.893831,-1.045461 50.893828,-1.045431 50.893831,-1.045403 50.893839,-1.045380 50.893853,-1.045366 50.893870,-1.045361 50.893890)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL