Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1578

reference
348-tree-1
name
1578
tree-preservation-order

undefined

348-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.045539 50.893840)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.045439 50.893830,-1.045444 50.893849,-1.045458 50.893867,-1.045479 50.893881,-1.045507 50.893890,-1.045538 50.893894,-1.045568 50.893891,-1.045596 50.893882,-1.045619 50.893868,-1.045633 50.893851,-1.045638 50.893831,-1.045634 50.893812,-1.045620 50.893794,-1.045598 50.893780,-1.045571 50.893771,-1.045540 50.893768,-1.045509 50.893770,-1.045481 50.893779,-1.045459 50.893793,-1.045445 50.893810,-1.045439 50.893830)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL