Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1577

reference
349-tree-1
name
1577
tree-preservation-order

undefined

349-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.046485 50.893196)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.046385 50.893186,-1.046390 50.893205,-1.046404 50.893223,-1.046425 50.893237,-1.046453 50.893246,-1.046484 50.893249,-1.046514 50.893246,-1.046542 50.893238,-1.046565 50.893224,-1.046579 50.893207,-1.046584 50.893187,-1.046580 50.893168,-1.046566 50.893150,-1.046544 50.893136,-1.046517 50.893127,-1.046486 50.893123,-1.046455 50.893126,-1.046427 50.893135,-1.046405 50.893149,-1.046391 50.893166,-1.046385 50.893186)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL