Skip to main content

This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1576

reference
356-tree-1
name
1576
tree-preservation-order

undefined

356-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.047136 50.892750)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.047036 50.892739,-1.047041 50.892758,-1.047055 50.892776,-1.047076 50.892790,-1.047104 50.892799,-1.047135 50.892803,-1.047165 50.892800,-1.047193 50.892791,-1.047216 50.892777,-1.047230 50.892760,-1.047235 50.892741,-1.047231 50.892721,-1.047217 50.892703,-1.047195 50.892689,-1.047168 50.892680,-1.047137 50.892677,-1.047106 50.892680,-1.047078 50.892688,-1.047056 50.892702,-1.047042 50.892720,-1.047036 50.892739)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL