Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1519

reference
364-tree-1
name
1519
tree-preservation-order

undefined

364-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.018915 50.893434)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.018815 50.893424,-1.018820 50.893443,-1.018834 50.893461,-1.018855 50.893475,-1.018883 50.893484,-1.018914 50.893488,-1.018944 50.893485,-1.018972 50.893476,-1.018995 50.893462,-1.019009 50.893445,-1.019014 50.893426,-1.019010 50.893406,-1.018996 50.893388,-1.018975 50.893374,-1.018947 50.893365,-1.018916 50.893362,-1.018885 50.893365,-1.018858 50.893373,-1.018835 50.893387,-1.018821 50.893404,-1.018815 50.893424)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL