Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0923

reference
371-tree-1
name
0923
tree-preservation-order

undefined

371-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.016025 50.894728)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.015925 50.894718,-1.015930 50.894737,-1.015943 50.894755,-1.015965 50.894769,-1.015993 50.894778,-1.016023 50.894782,-1.016054 50.894779,-1.016082 50.894770,-1.016105 50.894756,-1.016119 50.894739,-1.016124 50.894720,-1.016120 50.894700,-1.016106 50.894682,-1.016084 50.894668,-1.016057 50.894659,-1.016026 50.894656,-1.015995 50.894659,-1.015967 50.894667,-1.015945 50.894681,-1.015931 50.894698,-1.015925 50.894718)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL