Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0923

reference
372-tree-1
name
0923
tree-preservation-order

undefined

372-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.016111 50.894630)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.016011 50.894619,-1.016016 50.894639,-1.016029 50.894656,-1.016051 50.894670,-1.016079 50.894680,-1.016109 50.894683,-1.016140 50.894680,-1.016168 50.894671,-1.016190 50.894658,-1.016205 50.894640,-1.016210 50.894621,-1.016206 50.894601,-1.016192 50.894584,-1.016170 50.894570,-1.016143 50.894560,-1.016112 50.894557,-1.016081 50.894560,-1.016053 50.894569,-1.016031 50.894582,-1.016017 50.894600,-1.016011 50.894619)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL