Skip to main content

This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0446

reference
403-tree-1
name
0446
tree-preservation-order

undefined

403-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.024988 50.890804)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.024931 50.890798,-1.024934 50.890809,-1.024941 50.890819,-1.024954 50.890827,-1.024970 50.890832,-1.024987 50.890834,-1.025005 50.890833,-1.025021 50.890828,-1.025033 50.890820,-1.025042 50.890810,-1.025045 50.890799,-1.025042 50.890788,-1.025034 50.890778,-1.025022 50.890770,-1.025006 50.890764,-1.024989 50.890762,-1.024971 50.890764,-1.024955 50.890769,-1.024942 50.890777,-1.024934 50.890787,-1.024931 50.890798)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL