Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0854

reference
406-tree-1
name
0854
tree-preservation-order

undefined

406-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.024203 50.890030)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.024161 50.890025,-1.024163 50.890034,-1.024169 50.890041,-1.024178 50.890047,-1.024190 50.890051,-1.024203 50.890053,-1.024228 50.890048,-1.024238 50.890042,-1.024244 50.890034,-1.024246 50.890026,-1.024244 50.890018,-1.024238 50.890010,-1.024229 50.890004,-1.024217 50.890000,-1.024204 50.889999,-1.024191 50.890000,-1.024179 50.890004,-1.024169 50.890010,-1.024163 50.890017,-1.024161 50.890025)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL