Skip to main content

This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1426

reference
419-tree-1
name
1426
tree-preservation-order

undefined

419-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.006543 50.890825)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.006501 50.890820,-1.006503 50.890829,-1.006508 50.890836,-1.006518 50.890842,-1.006530 50.890846,-1.006543 50.890848,-1.006568 50.890843,-1.006577 50.890837,-1.006584 50.890829,-1.006586 50.890821,-1.006584 50.890813,-1.006578 50.890805,-1.006569 50.890799,-1.006557 50.890795,-1.006544 50.890794,-1.006531 50.890795,-1.006509 50.890804,-1.006503 50.890812,-1.006501 50.890820)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL