Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1054

reference
424-tree-1
name
1054
tree-preservation-order

undefined

424-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.037845 50.895637)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.037802 50.895633,-1.037804 50.895641,-1.037810 50.895649,-1.037819 50.895655,-1.037831 50.895659,-1.037844 50.895660,-1.037858 50.895659,-1.037870 50.895655,-1.037879 50.895649,-1.037885 50.895642,-1.037888 50.895633,-1.037886 50.895625,-1.037880 50.895617,-1.037870 50.895611,-1.037859 50.895607,-1.037846 50.895606,-1.037832 50.895607,-1.037820 50.895611,-1.037811 50.895617,-1.037805 50.895624,-1.037802 50.895633)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL