Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1054

reference
425-tree-1
name
1054
tree-preservation-order

undefined

425-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.037511 50.895418)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.037454 50.895412,-1.037457 50.895423,-1.037465 50.895433,-1.037477 50.895441,-1.037493 50.895446,-1.037510 50.895448,-1.037528 50.895446,-1.037544 50.895442,-1.037557 50.895434,-1.037565 50.895424,-1.037568 50.895413,-1.037565 50.895401,-1.037558 50.895391,-1.037545 50.895383,-1.037529 50.895378,-1.037512 50.895376,-1.037494 50.895378,-1.037478 50.895383,-1.037466 50.895391,-1.037457 50.895401,-1.037454 50.895412)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL