Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1054

reference
427-tree-1
name
1054
tree-preservation-order

undefined

427-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.037431 50.895055)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.037317 50.895043,-1.037323 50.895065,-1.037338 50.895086,-1.037363 50.895102,-1.037395 50.895112,-1.037430 50.895116,-1.037465 50.895113,-1.037497 50.895103,-1.037522 50.895087,-1.037539 50.895067,-1.037545 50.895045,-1.037540 50.895023,-1.037524 50.895003,-1.037499 50.894986,-1.037468 50.894976,-1.037433 50.894972,-1.037397 50.894975,-1.037366 50.894985,-1.037340 50.895001,-1.037324 50.895021,-1.037317 50.895043)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL