Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0937

reference
429-tree-1
name
0937
tree-preservation-order

undefined

429-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.035859 50.897023)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.035816 50.897018,-1.035818 50.897027,-1.035824 50.897034,-1.035834 50.897040,-1.035845 50.897044,-1.035859 50.897046,-1.035884 50.897041,-1.035893 50.897035,-1.035899 50.897027,-1.035902 50.897019,-1.035900 50.897011,-1.035894 50.897003,-1.035885 50.896997,-1.035873 50.896993,-1.035860 50.896992,-1.035846 50.896993,-1.035834 50.896997,-1.035825 50.897002,-1.035819 50.897010,-1.035816 50.897018)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL