Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0903

reference
430-tree-1
name
0903
tree-preservation-order

undefined

430-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.036176 50.895192)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.036134 50.895188,-1.036136 50.895196,-1.036141 50.895204,-1.036151 50.895210,-1.036163 50.895214,-1.036176 50.895215,-1.036189 50.895214,-1.036201 50.895210,-1.036210 50.895204,-1.036217 50.895197,-1.036219 50.895188,-1.036217 50.895180,-1.036211 50.895172,-1.036202 50.895166,-1.036190 50.895162,-1.036177 50.895161,-1.036164 50.895162,-1.036152 50.895166,-1.036142 50.895172,-1.036136 50.895179,-1.036134 50.895188)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL