Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0861

reference
44-tree-1
name
0861
tree-preservation-order

undefined

44-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-0.963942 50.787430)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-0.963885 50.787424,-0.963888 50.787435,-0.963895 50.787445,-0.963908 50.787453,-0.963924 50.787458,-0.963941 50.787460,-0.963959 50.787459,-0.963974 50.787454,-0.963987 50.787446,-0.963996 50.787436,-0.963999 50.787425,-0.963996 50.787414,-0.963988 50.787404,-0.963976 50.787395,-0.963960 50.787390,-0.963943 50.787388,-0.963925 50.787390,-0.963909 50.787395,-0.963896 50.787403,-0.963888 50.787413,-0.963885 50.787424)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL