Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1879

reference
45-tree-1
name
1879
tree-preservation-order

undefined

45-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.001384 50.794140)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.001327 50.794134,-1.001330 50.794145,-1.001338 50.794155,-1.001350 50.794163,-1.001366 50.794169,-1.001383 50.794171,-1.001401 50.794169,-1.001417 50.794164,-1.001430 50.794156,-1.001438 50.794146,-1.001441 50.794135,-1.001438 50.794124,-1.001431 50.794114,-1.001418 50.794106,-1.001402 50.794101,-1.001385 50.794099,-1.001367 50.794100,-1.001351 50.794105,-1.001339 50.794113,-1.001330 50.794123,-1.001327 50.794134)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL