Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1259

reference
494-tree-1
name
1259
tree-preservation-order

undefined

494-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.023382 50.882988)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.023340 50.882983,-1.023342 50.882991,-1.023348 50.882999,-1.023357 50.883005,-1.023369 50.883009,-1.023382 50.883010,-1.023395 50.883009,-1.023417 50.883000,-1.023423 50.882992,-1.023425 50.882984,-1.023423 50.882975,-1.023417 50.882968,-1.023408 50.882962,-1.023396 50.882958,-1.023383 50.882956,-1.023358 50.882961,-1.023348 50.882967,-1.023342 50.882975,-1.023340 50.882983)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL