Skip to main content

This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1499

reference
518-tree-1
name
1499
tree-preservation-order

undefined

518-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-0.971953 50.866642)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-0.971896 50.866636,-0.971899 50.866648,-0.971907 50.866658,-0.971919 50.866666,-0.971935 50.866671,-0.971952 50.866673,-0.971970 50.866671,-0.971986 50.866666,-0.971999 50.866658,-0.972007 50.866649,-0.972010 50.866637,-0.972007 50.866626,-0.971999 50.866616,-0.971987 50.866608,-0.971971 50.866603,-0.971954 50.866601,-0.971936 50.866603,-0.971920 50.866608,-0.971907 50.866615,-0.971899 50.866625,-0.971896 50.866636)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL